Amd 3600。 Ryzen 5 3600 vs. 3600X: Which should you buy?

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review

amd 3600

It sits just below the , which is essentially a slightly faster version of the same processor. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. The 9400F is the cheapest 9th generation Core i5 processor you can buy. We first broke this information in the first generation Ryzen reviews, and it seems that this persists here. But, that still makes it one of the cheaper, new, mid-range processors on the market. Multi Core Mixed Speed 1045 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed. Overall, these two processors have similar frametime pacing and consistency, with the 9600K faster by 0. It has a boost clock speed of 4. Quad Core Mixed Speed 486 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed. With compression, the R5 3600 pushes 55,000 million instructions per second, ranking it between the 1700 at 3. Functionality issues beyond signs of use should be disclosed in product description. Even though the 2600X is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Moving on to , the R5 3600 was 57% faster when comparing compression performance and it's remarkable that the margin widens further when comparing decompression performance where the 3600 was 66% faster. Any stand-out results are reported back to the test technician and rerun after investigation. The point of this is to magnify the data. Beyond this point the memory clock is forced to operate at a 2:1 ratio with the fabric clock, which can increase latency considerably and affect performance. That also makes it 25% cheaper than the R5 3600, so budget-minded builders may be considering going Intel after all. This seems to be the sweet spot. I don't live in a library and game with headphones, though. Image 4 of 4 Image credit: Infogram; Future Features and chipset While the update from the Ryzen 5 1600 to the Ryzen 5 2600 may have been iterative, the Ryzen 5 3600 is a bigger leap thanks to architecture. Interesting Overclocking Findings We noticed that, interestingly, our R9 3900X and R7 3700X overclocked with much lower voltage requirements than our R5 3600. The 3600 becomes a 3600X with the Wraith Spire and the 3600X becomes a 3600 with the Wraith Stealth. Another nice piece of its performance is efficiency. But back to today's comparison, the destroys the Core i5-9400F in core-heavy games and applications. Quad Core Mixed Speed 524 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed. A pattern emerges where cores 0 and 1 pass the ball back and forth, as do cores 4 and 5. Adobe Premiere shows the Core i5's best showing yet as the R5 3600 was 26% faster. Starting with these new reviews, we are now manually controlling every timing surfaced. Quad Core Mixed Speed 559 Pts Faster quad-core speed. That made it 45% faster than the Core i7-7700K and Ryzen 7 2700X. The most pronounced improvement across Ryzen generations is in the electrical department, however. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The end result is a good one, you can save money. But without question the most popular question we received afterwards was: should you buy the Ryzen 5 3600 or the 3600X? The R5 3600 is close to both of these when stock, and an overclock gets it only a time reduction of 4. Couldn't fit a bigger air cooler in my case, but the Wraith Prism seems pretty well optimized for this chip, anyway. A full Blender workload is up first. Pinnacle Ridge processors are designed to work with the new 400 series motherboards, which allow for greater overclocking head room, and they are also backwards compatible with the 300 series motherboard following a bios update. We use an internal peer review process where one technician runs tests, then the other reviews the results applying basic logic to ensure everything looks accurate. Power Consumption Perhaps more impressive are the total system power consumption figures we recorded when running the Blender benchmark. Please remember that behind every poster is a human. Gaming Benchmarks Moving on to gaming testing, first up we have Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. Unit of measurement: Render time in minutes lower is better. We recommend avoiding the 3600X and instead buy the more. Even an entry-level air cooler will often be more than enough for this particular chip. Thanks to the shift to the 7nm process, the Ryzen 5 3600 manages a substantially lower level of power draw under load than the Intel Core i7-8086K and Core i7-8700K, which hit 110. We see something similar thing in Hitman 2, average frame rates were a match but the R5 3600 was slightly stronger when it came to the 1% low performance. Interestingly, this time at 1440p the Ryzen 3600 was able to pull further ahead of the 9600K when looking at the 1% low performance. Error margins are also defined in our chart bars to help illustrate the limitations of statistical relevance when analyzing result differences. We also see a solid performance uplift in The Division 2, the R5 3600 provided an 18% performance uplift for the average frame rate and a 29% boost for the 1% low. This 7nm processor built upon the scalable architecture is arguably as close as you can get nowadays to the perfect blend of speed and value. Mostly to health, granted, but we did remove some tests from content for later benchmarking. As an aside, the 9700K and 9600K overclocks did yield notably higher low frametime performance than the rest of the pack. Like the other third generation Ryzen processors, the 3800X is compatible with the new enabled X570 chipset as well as the 400 and 300 series motherboards. As is often the case, Far Cry New Dawn does trip up the Ryzen processors and here the 9400F managed to take the lead, beating the R5 3600 by up to 19%, so a very convincing win for the Core i5 processor. It undercuts the 3600X by a sizable gap but still offers an identical feature set. Whatever we learned in years past with the and series does not apply here. Using the included box cooler we see virtually no difference in power draw between the 3600X and 3600 and the same is also true when using an aftermarket cooler. Where the Ryzen 5 3600 really shows its mettle is in gaming, with some results that even stomp on the big boys. We invested all we could into getting multiple reviews ready for launch day and will stagger publication throughout the day due to YouTube's distribution of content. All that plus a free cooler make for a solid value package. Before continuing with game benchmarks, we need a quick look at power and overclocking. Octa Core Mixed Speed 1065 Pts Much faster octa-core speed. Age Newest 9 Months Much more recent. Still you can very much call what we see here, 8700K-like performance from the new Ryzen 5 3600. Single Core Mixed Speed 142 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed. The 3600 with an overclock is near the R7 1700 at 3. Dual Core Mixed Speed 282 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed. The R5 3600 finishes the render in about 23% less time than the Intel i5-9600K, illustrating that V-Ray does actually utilize the threads. Similar to what we saw in the , the 3rd-gen Ryzen processors slip a little in this title at 1440p and this is also true of the R5 3600. Overclocking the 3600 ties it with the R7 1700 at 3. Those extra clocks are finally paying off some. Games - Total War: Warhammer 2 Campaign Benchmarks The second Total War: Warhammer 2 benchmark uses the campaign map seen in the grand strategy portion of the game. While X570 offers some improvement, with and largely null and void for most rocking a Ryzen 5, a cheaper motherboard seems to be the smarter choice. Additionally, the 3600's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. It currently costs 33% more, but it was often 50% faster in applications and provided roughly 30% gains in modern games. The compression performance is great, offering 14% more performance than the 8700K. Overclocking the R5 3600 gets it to 979 points, an improvement of just 2. Thank you for your understanding! Then when compare to the R5 1600, the new 3600 is 45% faster. At 1080p the R5 3600 edged out the 9600K and made a significant step forward from not just the 2600X, but also the 2700X. There's no need for petty insults on this sub. We also test with the campaign for a look at the turn-based vantage point. In short, using either cooler the 3600X ran 6 degrees hotter and you can expect some throttling with the Stealth cooler, so lets re-run this test again with the Corsair H115i Pro installed. As such the 3600 gets the 65w Wraith Stealth and the 3600X the 95w Wraith Spire. The Ryzen 5 3600X does eke out a bit of extra performance for a small premium, but going with the 3600 will offer extra room in your budget if you need to upgrade a different part of your gaming rig, like your or graphics processor. Rule 8: The moderators of reserve the right to allow posts or comments that could technically break any of the rules - remember, we're all just volunteers that do our best to cultivate content so that this subreddit can be the best that it can be. And finally when running the Open Data benchmark, the Ryzen is 53% faster. Hoping over to eBay we found the cost of Core i7-7700K completed listings -- that is 7th-gen Core i5 owners looking to upgrade -- spending Ryzen 5 3600 money on the 36 month old quad-core. Quad Core Mixed Speed 486 Pts Faster quad-core speed. The 1080p show report renders in 4. The bigger story is that a 3600 at 4. Compared to the R5 2600 it was 17% faster and a whopping 32% faster than the R5 1600 in V-Ray. Overclocking the 9600K closes the gap, ranking at 1. The memory kit is an important change for us. Here the R5 3600 was 12% more costly per frame. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 5 3600 pulled just 86. By controlling this ourselves, we eliminate this variable. Rules Rule 1: Tech support questions are only allowed in and must instead be posted at or. For this one, the Intel i9-9900K predictably chart-tops at 11. Its main target should be the 9600K and here it improves 1% low performance by 23%. We don't focus on ad revenue on the site these days and instead focus on our products and for revenue, plus ad revenue on YouTube. Rule 7: Shitposts, memes, and plain box pictures are not allowed as linkposts you can still include them within normal posts or comments. When we reviewed the new we had plenty of positive things to say about it, and note that in our review we compared it to the more expensive Core i5-9600K. The 9600K stock took 34 seconds to complete each turn, reducing average turn time by 5% versus the R5 3600 stock, and the overclocked 9600K is far beyond the overclocked 3600 in performance at 30. If the post lacks a summary comment, it will be removed. Single Core Mixed Speed 130 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed. But bear in mind the six-core Ryzen 3000s come in two flavours: the Ryzen 5 3600 and the. Octa Core Mixed Speed 799 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed. The best we could do with an all-in-one liquid cooler was a 4. Octa Core Mixed Speed 940 Pts Faster octa-core speed. We see the same in Battlefield V, the 3600X was only up to 2 fps faster than the non-X model, so about the same performance. When testing with Corona, the R5 3600 was 58% faster than the 9400F taking just 146 seconds to complete the test against the Core i5's 230 seconds. Dual Core Mixed Speed 256 Pts Faster dual-core speed. Meanwhile the single core performance sees an increase of just 3%, going from 481 pts to 497 pts. Modest effective speed improvements are expected, although further benchmarks are necessary to draw firm conclusions. If you want to reduce the operating volume and squeeze a tiny bit more performance out of this great-value Ryzen 5 processor, we recommend you grab something like the. The number of times tested depends on the application and its completion time. It is an 8 core, 8 thread processor. Multi Core Mixed Speed 1451 Pts Much faster 64-core speed. With a decent cooler installed, temperatures dropped quite significantly. It smoked the Core i5-9600K in every single application benchmark we ran and worst case matches its single core performance. Please contact the manufacturer to check. We are also detailing more explicitly the unit of measurement in text, although our charts typically do this as well. We see the disparity increase slightly between the Ryzen 5 3600 and the Ryzen 5 3600X in synthetic benchmarks, however. Fan speed curve is essentially: 40c 50%, 50c 70%, 65c 100%. The R5 3600 quickly gets back to crushing it though with a 49% win in the. The R5 3600 makes a big step towards closing that gap, with a stock average of 158. Gaming Benchmarks Moving on to games and… not much to say here either. The R5 3600 finishes in about the same time as the 3. Returned items with minor packaging defects fall under this category. The 4K render is a heavier workload. Product does not come with warranty unless stated otherwise in product description. In short, it murders the 9600K in core-heavy productivity benchmarks and is right there for gaming, offering better 1% low performance often, all while costing notably less. With simultaneous multi-threading enabled each processing thread is effectively doubled, making for a total of 12 threads available — the new norm for gaming chips since Ryzen arrived on the scene. Additionally, the 3800X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. Like Premiere, Photoshop prefers frequency first. Very underwhelming difference -- but could this be a good thing? The 9600K is one part that still has some room left, though, and the 5. The 3600X increased total system consumption by just 4% when measuring power draw from the wall. The 3600 does come up short against the 8700K in the latest version of the V-Ray benchmark by a 6% margin. Moving on to Adobe Premiere we see the biggest performance gain yet as the 3600X reduced the render time by 5%, taking 513 seconds opposed to 539 seconds. Our content is made possible by your support, especially via the products and. The 9600K with an overclock leaps by 13%, from 942 points to 1065 points. We got a glimpse of that with Far Cry which is built on a dated game engine. Single Core Mixed Speed 137 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed. Finishing up the gaming benchmarks we have Total War: Three Kingdoms and here the R5 3600 offered stronger 1% low performance than the 9600K with a slightly lower average frame rate. Dual Core Mixed Speed 256 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed. Copypasta articles sourced from other websites are not allowed. Cores 2 and 3 appear to do similar. Not much changes, but the 9700K at 5. For reference, an overclocked 2600 rendered the file in 5. The base model R5 3600 currently comes in at , while the 3600X costs 14% more at. Unfortunately we don't believe the prospects will be great then either. We are beginning to spend more effort publicly documenting the exact versions of our tests, hoping that this is helpful to those reading our tests. Using the Wraith Prism, I'm running it at 40. Performing transforms, warps, applying filters, color changes, and resizes, we see the 9900K illustrate what Photoshop likes in a processor. At 4K in the same game, it loses ground to its siblings, but mostly stays ahead of the same three Intel chips. Single Core Mixed Speed 130 Pts Faster single-core speed. This first chart shows frequency over time with a Blender workload, hitting all cores nearly equally. These are determined by taking thousands of test results per benchmark and determining standard deviation for each individual test and product. In this case the difference was more substantial with Ryzen offering 12% better minimum frame rates. There is no meaningful difference in the low performance metrics. Quotes are fine, but pasting the entire article in a textpost is not. For this test, we take measurements as they would apply to the duration of a 30-minute render, so we get a clearer picture. Cost per Frame and Wrap Up That was interesting and even a bit brutal. After playing with the fanspeed curves and in a 22c house, it idles around 38-41c. The Ryzen 5 3600 comes clocked at 3. The Ryzen processor was just 6% faster in Battlefield V when looking at the average frame rate, but 34% faster when measuring 1% low performance, The R5 3600 did provide a noticeably smoother gaming experience in this title. Power Consumption The Intel Core i5 9400F gets its first win. Frame rates in Rage 2 were quite close with an edge to the Ryzen processor in the 1% low result, but overall both felt very similar in actual gameplay. We find similar results at 1440p, though here the 3600 matches the 1% low performance of the 9600K. It did fall behind the 8-core Ryzen processors in the decompression test, but even so it was still 16% faster than the 8700K. Here it matched the Ryzen 7 1800X with just over 3600 pts. All tests are conducted multiple times for parity and then averaged, with outliers closely and manually inspected. As you can see the R5 3600 consumed the same amount of power as the quad-core Core i7-7700K and only slightly more than the i5-9600K. We won't share your email with anybody. That lump of cache can have an impact in both system responsiveness as well as gaming performance. More relevant to our conversation today, the R5 3600 finishes the render in 14. For the past two months it's been offered at the which is roughly a 15% discount since launch. We have to admit at times we felt we were feeding the 9400F to a woodchipper. This is more of an academic exercise to demonstrate behavior of Zen2. Finally, an overclock on the R5 3600 allows it to finish in about 3% less time than the stock 3600. In Middle Earth: Shadow of War, a game with different demands, the Ryzen 5 3600 averages performances levels in 1080p and 4K that nearly match those of the Intel Core i9-990K, Core i7-8086K, Core i7-8700K, and even the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 3900X. Some of our error margins have been reduced to 0. Octa Core Mixed Speed 799 Pts Faster octa-core speed. This boosted the Cinebench R20 multi-core score by a mere 4%. Then in the future your options are aplenty: or maybe even a 16-core 3950X, who knows what second hand deals will be available on these parts in a few years' time. The latest Windows updates and drivers available at the time of testing were installed. It's basically quiet for loads under gaming. Where the Ryzen 5 3600 shines is the the frugal gamers desktop. The single core performance is equally impressive, here the 3600 was just 4% slower than the 3700X and that meant it was able to match the Core i5-9600K and just edge out the 8700K. Gaming was definitely closer than productivity but even then the Ryzen shined more than its predecessors ever could. Speaking of which, we have , a traditionally strong showing for Intel processors. If you find it necessary, upgrade the box cooler to something better. It even beats its three higher-tier siblings. However we'd generally recommend to simply and if you want to reduce the operating volume and squeeze a tiny bit more performance, grab something like the that will be more effective anyway. The R5 3600 outperforms the stock 9600K with an 18% time reduction, further managing to finish in 7% less time than the overclocked 9600K. Our 3600 silicon is much worse than our 3900X and 3700X silicon, so the overclock requires 1. Later on we plan to test 3rd-gen Ryzen with some B350 motherboards to see just how well these new processors work on entry-level boards. Rule 2: No referral links, including Amazon! Wrap Up Is the Ryzen 5 3600X worth purchasing over the 3600? At the end of the day, they take turns boosting. Looking exclusively at gaming, on average the Ryzen 5 3600 was just 11% faster than the 9400F. Operating Temperatures Speaking of heat, let's look at how the 3600X compares with its 95w Wraith Spire box cooler to the 3600 with the 65w Wraith Stealth, when running Blender. A considerable uplift over past generations. The 3600 measured at 52W, overclocking pushed us to 56W, and the 3900X ran at about 76W when stock, or 72W overclocked. Testing with 7-zip we see the R5 3600 beating the 2700X. We're not into guessing games at TechSpot, so we've run some hard benchmarks to decide. The following guidelines apply to all product categories unless otherwise indicated within specific categories. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. When a situation has arisen where the post is especially funny, educational, or useful to the users of the subreddit, it may gain special immunities. The 1440p results were much the same, the 9600K creeped ahead by a few frames but overall performance was competitive and the 1% low performance of the 3600 was a good bit faster than any of the 2nd gen Ryzen parts. The Ryzen 5 3600 is packaged with the Wraith Stealth in lieu of the larger unit, a slim stock cooler capable of keeping your chip cool. Also read: Benchmarks The Cinebench R20 multi-core shows a very mild 2% increase in performance for the 3600X over the vanilla 3600. Product may or may not be in the original packaging. Even at 1440p, despite the 9600K appearing quicker when looking at the average frame rate, the 1% low performance of the 3600 was 18% higher and this allowed it to deliver a smoother and more consistent gaming experience. Adaptive sync is not used in testing. The Core i5-9400F is a good processor today, but when you consider the platform, future upgrade options are slim. The 3700X does offer a small performance boost over the 3600X in Shadow of the Tomb Raider but the 3600X was only up to 3% faster than the 3600. Some might argue the 3600X is a binned part and therefore will overclock better than the 3600. Gaming loads are 55-65c depending. In this respect, we can functionally use this test as an illustration of the impact of having so much L3 cache. But you can easily cross reference the results posted today with our. Use of slurs of any kind, racial, homophobic, or whatever, in any context will result in a ban. Next up we have Shadow of the Tomb Raider and here the 3600 matched the 9600K, which is a good result given the 9600K costs more. As for the 9600K, the stock performance leads the stock 3600 by 4. So this one's pretty cut and dry unless Intel decides to cut pricing heavily.。 。 。 。 。

次の

Which graphics card should I pair with AMD Ryzen 5 3600? Is a GeForce 1060 too low?

amd 3600

。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

AMD RYZEN 5 3600X 6

amd 3600

。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review

amd 3600

。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

Which graphics card should I pair with AMD Ryzen 5 3600? Is a GeForce 1060 too low?

amd 3600

。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. Intel Core i5

amd 3600

。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7

amd 3600

。 。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review

amd 3600

。 。 。 。 。 。

次の